Shoshana felman writing and madness pdf editor

I also have to say that I'm not particularly enamored by her style. At one hundred pages in length, Felman's analysis drags on for far too long, but the last few pages are a superb literary application of Lacan's idea that the "non-dupes err" - namely, that those who think they see the truth are as deluded as those who do not.

Jacques Lacan is a significant influence on Felman and she was among the vanguard of theorists—and perhaps foremost among those addressing Anglophone audiences [5] —to rigorously apply his concepts to the study of literature. More correctly, it is an analysis of the failure of Edmund Wilson's psychoanalytic interpretation of the text and others like it, with Felman showing how James constructs his text as a "trap" designed not only to capture the unwary, but more especially, the wary, sophisticated reader.

Work[ edit ] Felman works in the fields of psychoanalytic literary criticismperformativity theory, feminismHolocaust testimony, and other areas, though her writings frequently question, ironize, or test the limits of the very critical methods being employed.

When she hits on a good idea her prose really soars, but too much of her writing I found to be technical and clever rather than genuinely insightful.

The closing chapter and the interview with Miller are too short to be of much interest, but Sollers does a fine job of teasing out the motivations and nuances of Felman's ideas.

Shoshana Felman: ‘The Madness of Interpretation: Literature and Psychoanalysis’

I didn't get much insight, either, from the chapter on Jacques Lacan, which I found to be more verbose than genuinely difficult Ch. Since the s Felman has written texts on testimony and trauma, particularly in the context of the Holocaust and other collective trauma.

Unfortunately, Felman rather loses her way after this point. Writing and Madness was a book that I wanted to like as a whole - its topic is certainly an interesting and timely one - but I found that I could only relate to it in bits and pieces.

This section is easily one of the best in the book. Maybe others would find them more interesting.

Books by Shoshana Felman

Retrieved 17 January On the whole I felt as though Writing and Madness was a major letdown. Felman starts out by articulating the difficulties of speaking madness, as outlined by Michel Foucault in History of Madness. Often in her writing a reversal will occur so that the critical vocabulary gets subjected to and converted into the terms of the literary or cultural object being scrutinized rather than simply settling the meaning of the object; thus in Felman's style of criticism there is no fixed hierarchy of theory over and beyond the reach of the literary object.

Felman's point about the impossibility of Lacan's task, that he appears to be trying to create a universal grammar of the particularities of rhetoric, is an interesting one, but it would have made far more sense to connect this to Alfred Jarry's 'pataphysics, the absurdist "science of the particular.

Shoshana Felman

The English translation leaves out some of the literary analyses of Nerval and Balzac that were in the original book, no doubt because they are too technical for English readers, but that is made up for by two additional interviews with Jacques-Alain Miller and Philippe Sollers and a new preface by the author.

Authoritative, wide-ranging, and yet always lucid, she has helped to shape Lacanian studies since the middle s. The chapters on Nerval's Aurelia Ch.

Writing and Madness: Literature/Philosophy/Psychoanalysis

She then plunges into the intricacies of the debate between Foucault and Derrida Ch. By Shoshana Felman.

PDF Download

Palo Alto: Stanford University Press,viii + pp., $ hardcover, $ paperback. how to distinguish between writing madness and writing about it.

In other words, “while it was through literature that madness became the order of the day, now [in ] it seems that literature itself has been. Writing and Madness is Shoshana Felman's most influential work of literary theory and criticism.

Exploring the relations between literature, philosophy, and psychoanalysis through brilliant studies of Balzac, Nerval, Flaubert, and James, as well as Lacan, Foucault, and Derrida, this book seeks the specificity of literature in its relation to what culture excludes under the label "madness."Cited by: In this unique collection, Yale literary critic Shoshana Felman and psychoanalyst Dori Laub examine the nature and function of memory and the act of witnessing, both in their general relation to the acts of writing and reading, and in their particular relation to the Holocaust.

Moving from the. by Shoshana Felman. This material may not be reprinted, reproduced, photocopied, quoted, or cited, in whole or in part, without express permission of the author. Dec 06,  · Shoshana Felman and Psychoanalytic Criticism By Nasrullah Mambrol on December 6, • (1) Shoshana Felman is one of the most important post-Lacaniain psychoanalysts.

Felman’s work is situated at the interface of Postmodernism, cultural criticism and Psychoanalysis. The following ideas from Felman’s work are of great import.

Shoshana Felman and Psychoanalytic Criticism

Shoshana Felman Woodruff Professor of Comparative Literature and French Research Interests: 19th and 20th century French, English and American literature; literature and psychoanalysis, philosophy, trauma and testimony, law and literature; feminism, theater and performance.

Shoshana felman writing and madness pdf editor
Rated 4/5 based on 26 review
Read Download Writing And Madness PDF – PDF Download